Day 106 and returning home via Docklands, I took this at Canary Wharf.
Panasonic DMC-G3
Lumix G Vario 14-45
Focal length 34 mm (68 mm @ 35 mm equivalent)
1/320 sec
f/8
ISO 160
PAD 106 - 445
-
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
- Contact:
PAD 106 - 445
- Attachments
-
- 445
- 445.jpg (134.98 KiB) Viewed 2791 times
- Paul Heester
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Fri 18 Jan 2013, 13:16
Re: PAD 106 - 445
Nice reflection in the clockface and good B&W treatment.
Re: PAD 106 - 445
Mentioned it to Mike over PM but I still find the building tilt disconcerting. Though I understand your reasons why, I do find it makes me tilt my head oddly to try to compensate! 

-
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
- Contact:
Re: PAD 106 - 445
This is the text of the PM which I sent Dave over the weekend:
"There are two sets of verticals, the clock and the building. Leaving the building uncorrected with converging diagonals gives the impression of height, so it is quite normal to show this. If I had decided to correct the sides of the building, I would have been in for quite a bit of Photoshop work as it would also have stretched the clock into an oval. I did slightly straighten the image in Lightroom, but felt that having the clock at a slight angle looked better as there was symmetry with the building."
"There are two sets of verticals, the clock and the building. Leaving the building uncorrected with converging diagonals gives the impression of height, so it is quite normal to show this. If I had decided to correct the sides of the building, I would have been in for quite a bit of Photoshop work as it would also have stretched the clock into an oval. I did slightly straighten the image in Lightroom, but felt that having the clock at a slight angle looked better as there was symmetry with the building."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests