PAD 106 - 445

Post pictures you simply want to share with others. (Use "Image Critique" if you want to obtain feedback.)
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

PAD 106 - 445

Postby Mike Farley » Fri 19 Apr 2013, 10:29

Day 106 and returning home via Docklands, I took this at Canary Wharf.

Panasonic DMC-G3
Lumix G Vario 14-45
Focal length 34 mm (68 mm @ 35 mm equivalent)
1/320 sec
f/8
ISO 160
Attachments
445.jpg
445
445.jpg (134.98 KiB) Viewed 2791 times
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)
User avatar
Paul Heester
Posts: 622
Joined: Fri 18 Jan 2013, 13:16

Re: PAD 106 - 445

Postby Paul Heester » Mon 22 Apr 2013, 13:17

Nice reflection in the clockface and good B&W treatment.
User avatar
davidc
Posts: 2410
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2012, 11:27
Location: location, location.
Contact:

Re: PAD 106 - 445

Postby davidc » Mon 22 Apr 2013, 13:54

Mentioned it to Mike over PM but I still find the building tilt disconcerting. Though I understand your reasons why, I do find it makes me tilt my head oddly to try to compensate! :)
Check out my website - davidcandlish.photography
My Top 50 album is here
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

Re: PAD 106 - 445

Postby Mike Farley » Mon 22 Apr 2013, 14:36

This is the text of the PM which I sent Dave over the weekend:

"There are two sets of verticals, the clock and the building. Leaving the building uncorrected with converging diagonals gives the impression of height, so it is quite normal to show this. If I had decided to correct the sides of the building, I would have been in for quite a bit of Photoshop work as it would also have stretched the clock into an oval. I did slightly straighten the image in Lightroom, but felt that having the clock at a slight angle looked better as there was symmetry with the building."
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)

Return to “Photo Sharing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests